Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Q: Every time I try to do a "control-alt-delete," I get a message that says that it has been disabled by my administrator.

This is a personal home computer, and there is not any administrator but me.

How can I fix this problem and turn it
back on?


A: Windows XP has some pretty advanced settings for controlling various aspects of the system.

There is a policy editor that will allow you or anyone with admin rights to enable and disable various features of the operating system.

Chances are someone was playing with these settings and put in this restriction.

The quickest and easiest way to restore this functionality is to follow the instructions at windowsxp.mvps.org/Taskmanager_error.htm.

For more information on Group Policy, check out the Elder Geeks information page, at www.theeldergeek.com/group_policy_editor.htm.

Heed the warning, this is a powerful tool.
HoustonChronicle.com - Help Line
Now that it's all set up, here are WiFi add-ons
By DWIGHT SILVERMAN
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

ONE of the joys of having a wireless network is being able to add devices other than just computers. In theory, anything that supports a WiFi connection can join in and play.

In my previous three columns, I talked about designing a home network (www.chron.com/network1), setting it up (www.chron.com/network2) and troubleshooting (www.chron.com/network3). Now that everything's working as it should, it's time to have some fun.

The list of gadgets and add-ons that connect via WiFi is growing each month. There are wireless Web cameras, players for streaming digital media, WiFi stereo and video systems, PDAs and more.

And there are even cooler things around the bend. Kodak later this year will introduce a consumer digital camera with WiFi that lets you send photos directly to a hard drive on a computer network.

For my wireless network, I was most interested in streaming my digital music and photos from my PC to the living room stereo system. My TiVo Series 2 will do this, but not as well as I'd like. For example, you can't play music and surf your digital photo collection simultaneously.

A slew of wireless players can, however, so I gave D-Link's DSM-320 Wireless Media Player ($199) a spin. It's a second-generation model that supports faster 802.11g WiFi connections. While older models with slower 802.11b support could only play music and display still photos, these newer ones add video to the mix.

Wireless media players scour a computer network for digital media files, then let you play or watch them through standard home audio and video equipment. Because they're wireless, your TV and stereo don't need to be anywhere near the PC hosting the files.

D-Link's DSM-320 requires you to run software on at least one of the PCs on your network that acts as a server.

The PC, rather than the player, finds and indexes the files. This speeds up the discovery process, but it also means the software must be running on your PC whenever you want to use the player.

If you have Windows XP, you can also use an optional program from Microsoft (available from the Windows Update feature) called Windows Media Connect. This lets you play media files protected with Digital Rights Management, or DRM.


Setup is easy
Setting up the DSM-320 is relatively simple. Install the PC software and have it index your media files. Choose your video (S-video, composite or component) and audio (analog or optical) and connect the appropriate cables. Turn everything on, configure it to talk to your wireless network and you're ready to play.

My first few minutes with the device were frustrating. The DSM-320 was slow to scroll through lists of songs and photos, and balky when switching menus. I discovered a menu item that lets you quickly upgrade the device's firmware — built-in software that controls how the media player works — and once I did that, I saw a dramatic improvement.

(This experience is not uncommon with many wireless products, which are often rushed to market with buggy drivers and firmware. A good practice is to immediately check for software upgrades after installing any wireless device.

The DSM-320 will let you play songs individually or grouped by playlists and in folders. You can set it to shuffle at random through your collection as well.

The same is true with still images, which can be played in a slide show. And you can have a music playlist going at the same time as a slide show.

The menus are simple and easy to navigate using D-Link's supplied remote, although there's a slight learning curve. I had to dive deep into the settings, for example, to discover that you can make photo lists display with thumbnail images.


Get organized
If you have a lot of media files that are poorly organized, you'll have a tough time scrolling through long lists of images, songs and videos to find what you want to play. Spend time first sorting your media into folders on your hard drive and updating the info tags in your MP3 files.

The DSM-320 is one of the first wireless media players to work with copy-protected songs purchased from download music services, most notably Napster and MusicMatch, although to do so you'll need to use Window Media Connect instead of
D-Link's own software.

Unfortunately, it won't work with Apple's iTunes. However, I burn my iTunes purchases to CD, then rip them to non-protected MP3 files, which I can then play anywhere I like.

Windows Media Connect has some severe limitations, though. If you have your media stored on a mapped network drive, you'll have to install the program directly on the machine. D-Link, though, will let you index music found on a mapped drive.

The DSM-320 also will access streaming music services, such as those offered by Napster and America Online, if you have accounts with them. If you don't, the latest firmware upgrade enabled use of Live365, a free service that provides access to dozens of free Internet radio broadcasts. Unfortunately, these stations are sorted in any kind of order — you just have to surf through until you find one you like, then set it as a preset.

Audio is not bad, but don't expect CD-quality. While it's a couple of notches above FM radio, true audiophiles will be disappointed.


New blog
Check out my new technology Web log at www.chron.com/techblog. Once you're there, drop me a note with suggestions, comments or tech news tips.
HoustonChronicle.com - Computing: Now that it's all set up, here are WiFi add-ons

Saturday, February 19, 2005

ETEC: The sane choice for accelerated IT training.

Friday, February 18, 2005

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Boosting the signal gets wireless network humming

By DWIGHT SILVERMAN
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

Just because the computers in your new wireless home network can see and talk to each other doesn't mean they'll always play well together.

While WiFi is wonderfully convenient, it can be maddeningly finicky. Getting it to work at first is relatively simple; keeping it working can be a pain in the neck.

As I've written in this series of columns on my adventures in moving my existing home network from a two-story house in the burbs to a three-story, Montrose-area townhouse, I opted for WiFi over other network designs because of speed and freedom from cabling (see www.chron.com/network1).

Nearly all the computers in my home were outfitted with wireless adapters, and I hardened them against intruders by encrypting the signal between machines (see www.chron.com/network2).

As indicated in the first installment, I was concerned about getting the wireless signal from the third-floor home office down to the first floor. Testing with a router and a notebook computer in the empty townhouse before we moved in, the signal looked good initially.

But once I got our furniture in and got the computers set up and working, I learned something I didn't know about WiFi: Almost anything solid is a barrier that can diminish a signal. An empty house? Not a problem. A house full of furniture, appliances, modern electronics and people? That's a problem. The signal was so weak that using a laptop on the first floor was an exercise in frustration.

Even the connections for my wife's computer on the third floor, within line of sight of the wireless router, and a desktop on the floor immediately below the home office, were tenuous. Upgrading to the latest drivers for the D-Link adapters I was using helped a little, but not enough.

This was odd, because I'd used the same D-Link router at the previous house, and it provided excellent range. I was able to walk halfway down the block and still maintain a connection.

Time to troubleshoot.


Budget-priced attempt
I started by trying an inexpensive way of boosting the signal, buying an allegedly better antenna on impulse during a visit to MicroCenter. The Hawking Technologies High-Gain Antenna only cost me $21, but that was about all it was worth — I noticed no improvement in my WiFi network's signal.

I tried a range extender, the DWL-G800AP from D-Link ($85). This takes the signal from the router and repeats it beyond the normal range.

However, an extender must have a solid signal to repeat, and that wasn't always the case. It would lose its connection to the router from time to time, causing everything else to drop off the network. In addition, its use required disabling a security feature in the router — cloaking my network's name or SSID — and I didn't want to do that.

Doing research, I found 2.4 GHz channel cordless phones can be even more of a problem for 802.11g and b networks than I realized. Even when the phone is not in use, the handset periodically synchronizes with the base station. When the phone is being used, it can blast across frequencies used by WiFi, knocking devices off the network.

Because my new home is a townhouse, I have a common wall with a neighbor. I may not have any 2.4 GHz phones in my house (they're either 900 MHz or 5.8 GHz), but the folks next door apparently do, because the signal apparently bleeds over. I couldn't very well go knocking on their door and ask them to change phone types, so I had to figure something else out.


Newer standard
I tried switching to different channels on my 802.11g network. As I wrote last week, this flavor of WiFi has 11 channels, some of which overlap. By changing to channel 1, I discovered my wife's PC and the machine on the second floor quit losing connections. But it still didn't fix the range problem on the first floor.

There are several versions of the 802.11x protocol used for wireless computer networking. While I was using 802.11g, there's also the older and slow b; a, which is primarily used by corporations, has better range and operates on a different frequency; and the soon-to-be-approved n, which promises to fix a lot of WiFi's problems.

While 802.11n isn't yet available, one of the technologies that will go into it is. MIMO, or multiple in, multiple out, can dramatically extend the range and capabilities of wireless networking. It works by combining multiple 802.11g signals, providing more reach and bandwidth, making it better for streaming video and music over a wireless network.

Most major WiFi hardware makers — including D-Link, Belkin and Linksys — are coming out or already offer MIMO-based products. I decided to test Linksys' wares, which markets MIMO under the name SRX.


Picking a winner
I used a Linksys WRT54GX router ($200) with the company's WPC54G PC-card adapter ($80) for notebook computers. The router, with three adjustable antennas, has a decidedly sci-fi look — true geeks will appreciate it as much for its freaky appearance as its networking muscle.

While the Linksys lineup was quite pricey, it did the trick. The connection on the first floor was now rock-solid and fast. And even though Linksys doesn't yet offer MIMO-based PCI slot or USB adapters, standard 802.11g adapters also performed better talking to this router.

I was also curious to see if using 802.11a would fix the problem. While it's not compatible with 802.11b and g, several manufacturers offer products that are dual-band, sending both a and g signals.

I tried out Netgear's line of a/g products, including a WGU624 router ($105), a WG511U PC-card ($60) and a WG111U USB 2.0 adapter ($70). Focusing the computers on my network at the 802.11a signal, the results were as solid as with the Linksys, and no interference at all.

While my trusty D-Link router had worked well in the simpler environs of my suburban home, the more complex setup and the proximity of my equally unwired neighbors required stronger medicine.

I'm now able to connect from any room in the house, and the connection is reliable. I can now do what I set out to do — sit on the patio outside my new home, sipping coffee and exploring cyberspace.

Next: Adding bells and whistles.

RESOURCES
WIFINE-TUNING
Want to improve the wireless signal for your 802.11b or g WiFi network? Try these tips:

• Location, location: Place your wireless router above electronics and large metal objects, such as on top of a bookshelf. It should be a in central room with as few obstacles as possible between the router and networked devices.
• Change channels: Set your network's channel to 1, 6 or 11, which don't overlap. Find out which channels neighboring networks are using and change yours, or coordinate with them.
• Bears repeating: Try a range extender (sometimes called a repeater) to boost the signal into distant rooms. Range extenders must be matched to your router — not all extenders work with all routers.
• Stay updated: Download the latest versions of your router's firmware and the drivers for the wireless adapters in your PCs.
• Hang ups: Got 2.4 GHz cordless phones? Consider replacing them with 900 MHz or 5.8 GHz models.
• Get a boost: Replace your router's antenna with a high-gain model, or one that aims its signal in one direction.
• Upgrade: Consider spending more for newer equipment that includes MIMO technology, which dramatically boosts range. Or switch to 802.11a, which is less prone to interference and works better over longer distances.

HoustonChronicle.com - Computing

Tuesday, February 15, 2005

iPodder.org :

HOW TO PODCAST IN THREE (RELATIVELY) EASY STEPS:

The PC Guide Discussion Forums - Windows

Monday, February 14, 2005

HoustonChronicle.com - New tools ease collaboration, publishing online

Feb. 13, 2005, 9:06PM

New tools ease collaboration, publishing online

By MAY WONG
Associated Press

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- This scenario is all too familiar to office workers who collaborate electronically on projects: E-mails get passed around with differing versions of documents-in-progress attached. Instant messages whizz by. Web sites are cited, then lost.

It's often a jumbled mess, with no central online location for shared data.

There must be a better way.

A new crop of tools aims to help turn the Web -- be it on the public Internet or a company network -- into much more than a collection of documents one visits as in a museum: Look, but don't touch.

The idea is to make it easy to quickly post and remove stuff from digital bulletin boards where the online communities of the future will gather to catch up and trade ideas, images and work.

"We're turning the Web into a conversation," said Glenn Reid, chief executive and founder of Five Across Inc.

Reid's startup and several other companies will offer their visions for accomplishing that on stage this week at the DEMO conference in Arizona, an annual showcase of tech innovation.

All are trying to address in one way or another an emerging trend of making the Web less disjointed and more democratized -- a richer, more organized forum for gathering and sharing information.

These companies, and many others, are all part of a growing industry specializing in what Forrester Research analyst Charlene Li calls "social media."

JotSpot Inc., a Palo Alto-based startup, is betting on Wikis, a type of Web page that can be edited by anyone.

Wikis could become a staging area of sorts for information, and JotSpot's new Web service targets businesses that want to give authorized users a common location in which to collaborate.

Co-workers can take a spreadsheet, build on it, customize it, integrate data from the Web or e-mails and have all the information reside in one place on a Wiki Web site. Revisions are tracked and archived so nothing is ever lost.

Behind JotSpot is Joe Kraus, a serial entrepreneur who co-founded the early search engine Excite.

Kraus became a believer in Wikis after he and fellow co-founder Graham Spencer got fed up with exchanging hundreds of e-mails and attachments and tried using a Wiki instead while working on a business plan. That ultimately led to JotSpot's birth in October, competing against Socialtext and a handful of others in the fledgling market.

"We're in this transition of making it ever easier to publish (on the Web) and integrate previously siloed information and personalizing it," said Kraus, who is also JotSpot's chief executive.

Others, like Five Across and iUpload, aim to use the power of another form of Web publishing, online journals commonly known as blogs, to help businesses or individuals streamline their teamwork or communication.

Easy to use and update, blogs have gained traction in the past few years and are used by everyone from political pundits to pre-adolescents.

More than 8 million Internet users have created blogs, according to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, and a growing number of businesses are experimenting with blogs as tools for internal and external communication.

At DEMO, Palo Alto-based Five Across is introducing speedy technology that lets bloggers instantaneously update their blog pages with text, photos, audio or video clips, even spreadsheets and presentations, using easy drag-and-drop motions.

Called Bubbler, the tool allows members of a group to make a single blog more of a community than one person's mouthpiece.

Say someone has built a Web site for their child's soccer team. Setting up a community-style blog could help make the task easier, Reid said. A single person wouldn't be burdened with all the work.

The Bubbler blogging platform could also tap Five Across' existing software for instant messaging and file-sharing.

Ontario, Canada-based iUpload's new blogging product lets individuals communicate with other Web sites straight from their blogs. Users can pull their blog content -- whether it's a book review or a submission to a photo contest -- and send it to iUpload's online partners, which so far include auction giant eBay Inc., Web portal Yahoo Inc. and social networking site Tribe.

"You could live in your blog, author content and choose where the content will appear -- all without traipsing all over the Internet," said iUpload's chief executive Robin Hopper.

Another startup, Pluck Corp., will launch at DEMO a Web browser companion that's designed to be a one-stop personal information manager for search, blogs and data feeds known as "Really Simple Syndication," or RSS -- a system that grabs fresh information from designated sites and distributes summaries and links to the user.

A number of companies offer people the ability to compile RSS feeds on a single page, but Pluck also lets users share with friends and colleagues the feeds, Web site addresses and other information they find valuable. Pluck users can also direct the software to regularly scour the Web for items of interest.

The point is to save e-mail traffic and time.

The participants at this year's DEMO event, however, aren't the only ones that see the potential of turning what has traditionally been a read-only Web into what JotSpot's Kraus calls "a write-able Web."

Tech giants such as Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo already have made investments in consumer-oriented blogging technologies and have started to integrate them into their Web portal services.

"There are big players setting the pace with their large base of customers, but a lot will be driven by the innovation of some of these smaller companies," analyst Li said. "It's like a genie now. You can't put it back in the bottle."
HoustonChronicle.com - New tools ease collaboration, publishing online

Friday, February 11, 2005

eXeem

Thursday, February 10, 2005

PQI Corporation

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Set Permissions on Shared Network Resources

Resolving network problems

Building a home network: Get everyone talking
By DWIGHT SILVERMAN
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

WIFI has become the technology of choice for home users who want to link PCs to each other and the Internet.

Being able to put a device anywhere and have it talk to others of its kind is the ideal — when it works.

As I wrote in the first installment of this series on choosing, designing and troubleshooting a home network, I reworked my setup after a move from a house pre-wired with Ethernet cable to an unwired townhome (See www.chron.com/network1). Going from two to three stories presented challenges.

After examining the most common types of home networks — wired Ethernet, phone line, power line and wireless — I opted for wireless. Despite significant drawbacks, convenience and cost won out.

I have several computers I need to connect to each other and to the Internet and had to consider that our home office — where the cable modem and router live — is on the third story. The signal would have to reach a first-floor bedroom.

This requires a wireless router, which functions like a traffic cop on the network, directing the flow of information to the appropriate device. The other computers each need a wireless adapter, allowing them to talk to the router.

The flavor of WiFi I chose was 802.11g. This allows for theoretical speeds of 54 megabits a second, although the real rate is always less than that, for a variety of reasons.

While 802.11g is an accepted standard, vendors tweak it in different ways. While you should be able to mix hardware, it doesn't always work out.

I decided to stick with one brand, D-Link. I'd tested that company's 802.11g router, the DI-624 ($75), a while back and liked its ease of use and the reach of its signal.

I wanted at least one computer hard-wired to the router, so I could troubleshoot if something happened to the wireless signal. I also have an older computer used solely to store family music, video and data files. It also needed to be connected via Ethernet. That was the easy part — almost all routers have hard-wire connections.

My wife's computer is in the same room as mine, but the configuration there requires it be connected wirelessly. For that one, I chose an adapter that plugs into a USB port, D-Link's DWL-G120 ($59).

My older daughter's desktop is on the floor below the home office. That one called for a WiFi adapter that plugs into a PCI slot on the motherboard, D-Link's DWL-G520 ($59).


Far from the router
My younger daughter uses whatever notebook computer I'm reviewing at the time, which she'll often take to a ground-floor room that's the farthest point in the house from the router. Most modern notebooks have built-in WiFi, but to keep everything from the same manufacturer, I added a D-Link DWL-G650 ($50) that slides into the PC Card slot on most notebooks.

Finally, I have a TiVo digital video recorder that connects to the Internet for its program information. Tivo will only connect via certain types of older, 802.11b WiFi adapters. I couldn't use a D-Link model on it, so went with a USB-based Linksys WUSB-11 ($40).


Step by step
Now to set it all up, striving for maximum performance and tight security.

• Beginning with the router, I renamed the default password that provides access to its browser-based configuration screens. Not doing so could allow a tech-savvy evildoer to change it for you, locking you out of your own network.

• The nice thing about consumer WiFi routers is that they allow you to connect a network right out of the box, with minimal fuss. Security-wise, though, that's also the bad thing about them. Key security features are usually off by default, and turning them on should be a priority.

Wireless security involves encrypting — a scrambling system — data that moves between devices. The same key or password is used on both the sending and receiving end. There are different kinds of WiFi encryption techniques, the two most common being WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) and WPA (WiFi Protected Access). While WPA is considered tougher, I opted for WEP because not all wireless adapters support WPA.

One drawback to encryption — it can slow performance and reduce range. But the alternative is to leave your wireless network wide open.

• Setting up a WiFi network includes giving it a name, known as an SSID (Service Set Identifier). This lets you see the network in a computer with a WiFi adapter, making it easier to connect. But most routers let you hide the SSID by not broadcasting it. While a techie with the right wireless-sniffing software could see a hidden network name, the average user will never know your network is there if you turn off SSID broadcasting.

• Most of the computers on my network had D-Link adapters that are capable of faster speeds, up to 108 Mbps, with a feature D-Link calls AirPlus Xtreme G. I set up the router to recognize these devices but still allow the slower adapters to talk to it.

• Finally, I wanted to minimize interference from other wireless networks. As mentioned last week, 802.11g works on 11 different channels. All but three (1, 5 and 11) overlap radio frequencies. I wanted to make sure mine didn't use the same channels used by my neighbors.

I employed a nifty little device made by Canary Wireless called the Digital Hotspotter ($50) to pick an unused channel. About the size of a fat Zippo lighter, it scans for wireless networks and, when it finds one, shows the network name, whether encryption is turned on and the channel it's using.

How'd it all come together?

Nothing ever works perfectly — after all, we are talking about computers. I had some ... issues.

Next week, I'll tell you how everything worked — or didn't — and what I did to fix the problems.
HoustonChronicle.com - Computing

Monday, February 07, 2005

'Cell' chip challenges Intel's dominance

Competitors mount challenge to Intel
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — Setting up a battle for the future of computing, engineers from IBM, Sony and Toshiba unveiled details today of a microprocessor they claim has the muscle of a supercomputer and can power everything from video game consoles to business computers.

Devices built with the processor, code-named Cell, will compete directly with the PC chips that have powered most of the world's personal computers for a quarter century.

Cell's designers say their chip, built from the start with the burgeoning world of rich media and broadband networks in mind, can deliver 10 times the performance of today's PC processors.

It also will not carry the same technical baggage that has made most of today's computers compatible with older PCs. That architectural divergence will challenge the current dominant paradigm of computing that Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp. have fostered.

The new chip is expected to be used in Sony Corp.'s next-generation PlayStation game console. Toshiba Corp. plans to incorporate it into high-end televisions. And IBM Corp. has said it will sell a workstation with the chip starting later this year.

Beyond that, companies are remaining coy about where it might be used and whether it will be compatible with older technology.

Supercomputer claims are nothing new in the high-tech industry, and over the years chip and computer companies have steadily improved microprocessor performance even without altering chips' underlying architecture.

And while its competitors may well match the Cell chip in performance by the time it debuts in 2006, it differs considerably from today's processors in constitution.

Cell is comprised of several computing engines, or cores. A core based on IBM's Power architecture controls eight "synergistic" processing centers. In all, they can simultaneously carry out 10 instruction sequences, compared with two for today's Intel chips.

The new microprocessor also is expected to be able to run multiple operating systems and programs at the same time while ensuring each has enough resources. In the home, that could allow for a device that's capable of handling a video game, television and general-purpose computer at once.

"It's very flexible," said Jim Kahle, an IBM fellow. "We support many operating systems with our virtualization technology so we can run multiple operating systems at the same time, doing different jobs on the system."

Later this year, Intel and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. plan to release their own "multicore" chips, which also increase the number of instructions that can be executed at once. IBM and Sun Microsystems Inc. already sell chips with multiple cores, mainly for business servers.

On Monday, Intel announced that it has completed the first product runs of its dual-core processors and said it plans to deliver two separate dual-core Pentium chips and chipsets in the second quarter.

Cell appears to have an advantage in the number of transistors — 234 million compared with 125 million for today's latest Pentium 4 chips. Traditional chip makers, however, have regularly doubled their number of transistors every 12 to 18 months.

Cell is said to run at clock speeds greater than 4 gigahertz, which would top the 3.8 GHz of Intel's current top-speed chip.

Cell's designers said they are running a variety of operating systems on the processor at their lab in Austin, Texas. But they would not say whether Microsoft's Windows is one of them. In fact, they only confirmed running Linux, the open source environment.

The PC industry has seen a long line of chips attempt to usurp the x86 architecture pioneered by Intel that dominates today's computers. But all have failed, and Intel remains the world's largest chip maker.

In the 1990s, IBM, Motorola Inc. and Apple Computer Inc. pushed the PowerPC architecture. Though it's still used by the Apple Macintosh as well as IBM workstations and servers, it failed to dethrone Intel.

Most recently, Transmeta Corp.'s Crusoe was supposed to challenge Intel's dominance in notebooks. Launched at the twilight of the tech boom in 2000, it gained only marginal acceptance and the company is now considering plans to focus on licensing its patents.

Intel has since developed its own mobile chip technology, Centrino.

"Transmeta was also a disruptive influence in the market. And because of Transmeta, we've got Centrino and the advances that have happened in mobile computing," said Steve Kleynhans, a Meta Group analyst. "Unfortunately, we don't really have Transmeta anymore."

For a challenger to succeed in displacing x86, it will have to perform considerably better since it also will break computing's long-standing tradition of backward and forward compatibility, said Justin Rattner, who oversees Intel's Corporate Technology Group.

"They're going to have to show they're able to do things that conventional architectures at least at the moment are incapable of doing," he said. "That's the fundamental question."

The Cell's specifications also suggest the PlayStation 3 will offer realistic graphics and strong performance. But analysts cautioned that not all the features in a product announcement will find their way into all systems built on the device.

"Any new technology like this has two components," Kleynhans said. "It has the vision of what it could be because you need the big vision to sell it. Then there's the reality of how it's really going to be used, which generally several levels down the chain from there."
HoustonChronicle.com - 'Cell' chip challenges Intel's dominance

Sunday, February 06, 2005

Storage: Upgrading to bigger hard drive. How can i transfer all my data to include OS?

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

NetIQ: File Security Administrator

UserEnv Returns Corrupted Profile for All Failures Including RSL Exceeded

Adventures in networking start with picking design

By DWIGHT SILVERMAN
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

When it comes to home networking, nothing's as maddening as setting one up for the very first time. Unless, of course, you count setting one up for the second time.

I recently relocated from Houston's distant suburbs to the furiously beating heart of the city. My family traded a two-story brick house adjacent to Hewlett-Packard's wooded campus for a three-story stucco townhome near Montrose.

I also traded a structure prewired with network cable for one that is not. When we built the burbhouse in 1996, I had Ethernet wiring run from two of the upstairs bedrooms down to the first-floor home office.

Although our new home was built more recently, in 1998, it was not prewired. I had to rethink how the network was designed and get everything working to the satisfaction of my "customers," who would whine without mercy if the experience here wasn't as solid as it was there.

In the process, I've learned a lot, and over the next four weeks, I'll share it with you. February's Computing columns will detail my adventures in networking, with a goal toward helping you avoid some mistakes I made.

I began by looking at the layout of my new home and pondering the pros and cons of home networking technologies.

• Ethernet wiring. In a perfect world, a wired network is the best. It's fast, reliable, secure and inexpensive. It's also relatively simple to set up — at least, getting wired computers to talk to each other is simple. Getting cables from one computer to another is not.
I had the perfect scenario with my previous home, in which I was able to have the builder add cabling before the drywall went up. Once built, though, running cables through walls is a major project.

If you've got a single story, pier-and-beam home, just route the cables under the floor. On a slab foundation, you can go through the attic. But add a second story, and things get a lot more complicated.

With three stories ... be afraid. Be very afraid.

I was hoping to use Ethernet wiring for the two computers in our third-floor home office. But the room's loft configuration — with a doorway breaking one wall and a stairwell another — combined with the placement of the cable modem meant I'd either have to run cable under wall-to-wall carpeting or around a door frame. The aesthetic horror was too much to bear.

Reluctantly, scratch Ethernet.

• POWER LINE/PHONE LINE. Two of the most intriguing home networking technologies use the phone and electrical wiring already in a home. It's a great idea because even older homes usually have a phone jack and several electrical plugs in each room.
But there are drawbacks to HomePNA, the phone line variety, and HomePlug, the electrical type.

Neither is as fast as Ethernet and, in some cases, wireless networking. Ethernet typically runs at 100 megabits a second, although new Gigabit Ethernet hits speeds of 1,000 mbps. The 802.11g version of WiFi wireless networking runs at 54 mbps, and some manufacturers have tweaks that can theoretically double that.

HomePNA maxes out at 10 mbps, while HomePlug's speed is 14 mbps. A faster, 128 mbps version of HomePNA has been approved by that group's standards committee, but products supporting it are nowhere to be found.

If all you want to do over a network is share an Internet connection, 10 and 14 mbps connections are fine. After all, the maximum rate of most broadband Internet services is well under those speeds. But if you share audio and video files over a home network, as I do, you'll need more bandwidth.

In addition, HomePlug makes me — and a lot of other PC users — a little nervous. The idea of plugging a network adapter into a 120-volt socket doesn't sit well with me. Lightning strikes, power surges and "dirty" current give me the willies.

Scratch phone line & power line networking.

• WIRELESS. While wireless, or WiFi, networking has a lot to recommend it, there are also a lot of downsides.
No, you don't have to drill through walls, and it's relatively fast. But walls and speed remain issues.

A wireless network uses radio frequencies in the 2.4-gigahertz range to transmit data between computers. The design of 802.11g, the most cost-effective form of WiFi, allows for 11 channels within that range.

Unfortunately, other devices also use that spectrum, including cordless phones and microwave ovens. And all but three of WiFi's 11 channels overlap each other, so a neighbor's wireless network could conflict with yours.

Finally, the speed and reliability of a wireless network connection decreases over distance and drops even more when it must pass through physical barriers. My new home's design dictated that the cable modem and the wireless router had to be on the third floor. I wanted the connection to reach through two floors and a wall to the first floor.

There are other flavors of WiFi that avoid some of these headaches, but they're either more expensive (such as 802.11a) or not yet widely available (802.11n).

Would distance and interference be an issue in this new house? I decided to conduct a little test.

Before we moved our furniture in, I brought a wireless router and a WiFi-enabled notebook computer to the new digs. I set the router up on the third floor and began roaming around the townhouse with the notebook, checking signal strength.

I found not only could I get a usable signal on the first and second floors, but I also could connect sitting outside on a tiny patio. Visions of contemplating the urban landscape while checking e-mail and finding new neighborhood restaurants danced in my head.

Wireless it is.

Next: Making the dream a reality.

RESOURCES
Home computer users setting up a network can choose from several technologies. Here are the pros and cons:

Wired Ethernet

Uses cables to connect computers and other devices. Each device requires a network adapter, with cabling leading to a router, hub or switch. • Pros: Fast (between 10-1,000 megabits per second), secure, inexpensive, reliable. Easiest to set up in PC and Mac software.
• Cons: Requires physical wires between computers, which can be costly, labor intensive and potentially destructive to property.

Phone line and power line

Uses existing telephone and electrical wiring to link computers. Each networked device requires an adapter that plugs into the phone or power network. • Pros: Simple to install — just plug into the appropriate jack or plug — and convenient. Relatively secure.
Cons: Not as fast as wireless or wired Ethernet, at 10 and 14 Mbps. (Faster 128 Mbps phone line networking standard is approved, but products aren't out yet.) In buildings with shared electrical circuits, security may be an issue.

Wireless or WiFi

Uses radio frequencies to transmit data between computers and other devices. Each networked devices requires a wireless transmitter/receiver.
• Pros: Devices can be placed anywhere, without regard to wires. Easy to physically set up. Fast, at 11-108 Mbps.
• Cons: Signal degrades with barriers and distance. Most common WiFi networking type subject to interference from 2.4 gigahertz cordless phones and neighboring networks. Can be costly and difficult to configure on some computers.

HoustonChronicle.com - Computing: Networking starts with design
Who links to me?